Presentation video link: http://goo.gl/YT7KZ

I hope you will like as much as I did.

Harmonics: A sinusoidal component of a periodic wave having a frequency that is an integer multiple of the fundamental frequency.

Inter-harmonics: Components with frequencies between two consecutive harmonics or those components whose frequencies are not integer multiples of the fundamental power frequency.

Sub-harmonics: A special subset of interharmonics that have frequency values that are less than that of the fundamental frequency.

Table below illustrate their usage with examples for a 50Hz system.

Note: Information presented here and illustration was taken from the Prof. A. Testa’s power quality course lecture held at the University of Manchester on the 26th Jan 2010. Some information was obtained through email exchange between Prof. V. Katic and I following my attendance of the course. Thank you Gentlemen.

The report summarises on the following:

• Aspects of voltage sag characteristics that equipment manufacturer should account for and test especially during equipment development;
• Recommendations on equipment testing for voltage sags;
• Industrial process immunity assessment to voltages sag problems;
• Proposal for a classification of equipment based on voltage-dip immunity.

A small part of my doctoral research ‘process immunity to voltage sags’ work contributed to this report.

Have you ever been in a situation or seen a situation where the system on the side of good rewards the bad guy for doing bad, and punishes good guy for doing good? Well, no worries if you haven’t experience it yet. If you at a power system network with watt/energy meters  that do not account for harmonics, you will get to see this first hand. Energy meters that do not account for harmonics will reward non-linear loads for injecting harmonic pollution into the network by showing less energy consumption reading, while penalising  linear loads for forced harmonics pollution absorption by showing high consumption reading even though they actually consume less useful power than the meter reading. Sounds very dodgy, doesn’t it? Here’s the reason why?

Imagine a power systems network with a linear load ( i.e. non-linear << linear) customer and non-linear load ( i.e. linear << non-linear) customer fed from the system busbar, with both customers’ utility watt meters that do not account for harmonics.

The non-linear load due to its non-linear voltage-current relationship will use part of the supplied power to generate and inject harmonic currents back into the supply system. And if there is sufficient impedance between the PCC (Point of Common Coupling, or the customer supply point) and the non-linear equipment, then this impedance will distort the supply voltage waveform, i.e. instantaneous voltage = voltage fundamental + sum of harmonic voltages (due to Ih*Zh, h is harmonic order). As the current harmonics are injected back into the supply, the powers (product of current and voltage in VA) at these injected frequencies, the meter will see the total effect as a reduced energy consumption reading, i.e. energy reading = supplied power to the non-linear customer – harmonic powers injected by the non-linear equipment into the supply system.

For the linear load customer, however, the effect will be opposite. The linear will absorb the harmonic currents along with the fundamental frequency current. The absorbed harmonic currents by the linear load will generate harmonic voltages at harmonic current frequencies. That powers absorbed by the load at the absorbed harmonic frequencies will add on to the actual useful power required to do the job, therefore penalising the linear load. The linear load energy reading = required power for the linear load to do the job + harmonic powers absorbed by the linear equipment from the supply system.

Lesson learnt: Install (for your own measurement) or check (if metered by a utility installed meter) a energy meter  that take harmonics into account, so the customer pays for what he consumes and not for all the pollution he is forced to consume.

Note: The discussion presented here and illustration was taken from the Prof. A. Testa’s power quality course lecture held at the University of Manchester on the 26th Jan 2010.

Hope you found it useful, interesting and fun as I did. Thanks for reading!

The course had four sections, two sections each by Prof. A. Testa and Prof. V. Katic, each presenting alternatively. Prof. A. Testa lectures were more academic: harmonic concepts, math, analysis methodologies, harmonic problems, harmonics research challenges and focus. While Prof. V. Katic lectures focused on the practicalities in dealing with harmonic problems, harmonic standards and how these standards come up with harmonic limit numbers, harmonics measurement and mitigation. Both presenters were brilliant! The lecture content and presenters were most close what I need to brush my knowledge about and learn harmonic concepts.

I will touch on some of the course material I learnt and found interesting in my coming blogs.

Take care!

Download the brochure. The document includes course scope, schedule, and presenter biographies.

I have been a student at the university, completing a masters and a doctoral degree, between 2003-2008. Since leaving school  I’ve been in contact with the power system group staff and colleagues at the university. This comes as a surprise to me seeing the group organising this specialised Power Quality course inviting renowned researchers in this field.  Not that the group has’t invited people or has not been visited by top researchers before, but never to my knowledge was a course for 3days like this one. Well done Power Systems group.

Hope the attendees will find it useful. Good luck!

The following are the two quick tips recommended during this seminar on how to identify the source of voltage sags.

• If voltage sags coincides with depression in current flow into the customer’s feeder then the source of voltage sag source is external to customer’s facility;
• However if the voltage sag coincides with increase in load current flow into the customer’s supply feeder then the source of voltage sags problem is within the customer’s facility.

Principle:

Typical causes of voltage sags due to external utility are faults and switching on/off of large loads (induction motors etc.) at the utility network or at the neighbouring customer’s facility connected to the point of connection (or supply) as our customer. In this case, the cause of voltage sags is due to large voltage drops across circuits caused by large currents drawn during system events (faults, sudden connection of large load etc), and our customer’s facility as a result will receive reduced current. Therefore for external causes of voltage sags, the voltage sags coincide with depression current consumption in to our customer’s feeders.

On the other hand, the same system events (faults etc.) when arise within our customer’s facility, then large currents are drawn by customer’s supply feeders causing voltage to depress, and thereby having increased current consumption coinciding with voltage sags.

The above voltage sag source detection logic is simple, yet has hugely practical implication in isolating the problem quickly.

There is also considerable amount online resource available on various power monitoring and application aspects at the Fluke UK Application Notes section. Hope you will learn something new here having thoughts like: ‘Hey! That’s interest and useful, I didn’t know that before.’, or feel good at heart thinking ‘Ah! I knew that and I could teach some folks perhaps’. However you feel, hope you will have a good time perusing through them.

Have fun!

I have had an opportunity to meet Alex McEahern and talk to him during his visit and meeting with my PhD academic supervisor Prof. J V Milanovic. It was a pleasure talking and listening to his ideas, work and his company ‘Power Standards Lab’.

He developed an  interactive software teaching toy for young engineers like to me to understand and identify various  power quality problems. Links: Power Quality Teaching Toy; Online PQ tutorials; and Power Standard Lab.

This is a video showing the inspection of a live overhead electric transmission line.

For those power system engineers like me who spend most of their time at their work desk with ocassional field trips, this is one darn video bringing in the good blood rush up their veins. Pretty impressive and highly motivational!

Have Fun!

Where,  is the total current harmonic distortion at the point of measurement, and are fundamental and total harmonic RMS currents, and  is the distortion power factor (in other words distortion factor associated with power factor).

The above equation leads to the following conclusions:

• PF≤DPF, True Power Factor is always less than or equal to Displacement Power Factor.
• PF = DPF, True Power Factor equals Displacement Power Factor when there are current harmonics at the point of measurement;
• PF<DPF, suggests presence of harmonics, take it easy: awareness is good.
• PF<<DPF, means its time to take action.

The above observations, comparing DPF and PF will give you a quick assessment of harmonic severity, however if detail assessment is required then you will need to monitor both and .

As I understand, most meters or monitoring equipment that display PF and DFC also may have the ability to calculate both current and voltage total harmonic distortion factors: and , sometimes including individual harmonics levels as numbers and/or as a harmonic spectrum bar chart. Now if have measured these values, i.e. both THD for current and voltage, and individual harmonics levels in %, then compare them against the harmonics standards that govern your electric network, and you will know the severity of the harmonic problem.

In UK, DNOs are required to comply with EN50160 Std. and consumers with G5/4-1 Std.